Alternative Dispute Resolution FAQs

ADR refers to methods of resolving disputes outside of a full court trial, primarily mediation and arbitration. Mediation uses a neutral third party to help the sides reach a voluntary settlement, while arbitration involves a neutral decision-maker who resolves the dispute. ADR is often faster, less expensive, and more private than litigation.

In many cases, yes. Where a fair resolution is achievable, ADR can save time, money, and stress, and it keeps the outcome more within the parties’ control. It is not right for every dispute, and some matters do need to be litigated. We advise honestly on whether ADR serves your interests in your particular situation.

It depends on the method. A mediated settlement is binding once the parties agree to it and sign, while arbitration may be binding or non-binding depending on the agreement between the parties. We make sure you understand what you are agreeing to before you enter any ADR process.

Generally yes for mediation. If mediation does not produce a settlement, the dispute can proceed to litigation, and the firm’s litigation background means we are prepared to continue advocating for you. Arbitration outcomes are more limited in their appealability. We keep your options in view throughout the process.